Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 03:24
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
MGK makes rare appearance with teen daughter for whom he is a ‘cheerleader’ - CNN
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Who are the K-Pop group members that you solo stan?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Lawyers could face ‘severe’ penalties for fake AI-generated citations, UK court warns - TechCrunch
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What are some of your shocking stories?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Apple’s latest AirPods Pro with USB-C just received a $70 discount - The Verge
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
An AIDS orphan, a pastor and his frantic search for the meds that keep her alive - NPR
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Flight attendant reportedly found naked during flight from SFO - SFGATE
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years: